AMD Revises Bulldozer Transistor Count: 1.2B, not 2B

Publish date: 2024-05-25

This is a bit unusual. I got an email from AMD PR this week asking me to correct the Bulldozer transistor count in our Sandy  Bridge E review. The incorrect number, provided to me (and other reviewers) by AMD PR around 3 months ago was 2 billion transistors. The actual transistor count for Bulldozer is apparently 1.2 billion transistors. I don't have an explanation as to why the original number was wrong, just that the new number has been triple checked by my contact and is indeed right. The total die area for a 4-module/8-core Bulldozer remains correct at 315mm2.

CPU Specification Comparison
CPUManufacturing ProcessCoresTransistor CountDie Size
AMD Bulldozer 8C32nm81.2B ~2B315mm2
AMD Thuban 6C45nm6904M346mm2
AMD Deneb 4C45nm4758M258mm2
Intel Gulftown 6C32nm61.17B240mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge E (6C)32nm62.27B435mm2
Intel Nehalem/Bloomfield 4C45nm4731M263mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 4C32nm4995M216mm2
Intel Lynnfield 4C45nm4774M296mm2
Intel Clarkdale 2C32nm2384M81mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT1)32nm2504M131mm2
Intel Sandy Bridge 2C (GT2)32nm2624M149mm2

Despite the downward revision in Bulldozer's transistor count by 800M, AMD's first high-end 32nm processor still  boasts a higher transistor density than any of its 45nm predecessors (as you'd expect):

Transistor Density Comparison

Transistor density depends on more than just process technology. The design of the chip itself including details like the balance between logic, cache and IO transistors can have a major impact on how compact the die ends up being. Higher transistor densities are generally more desirable to a manufacturer (fewer defects per die, more die per wafer, lower costs), but from the end user's perspective the overall price/performance (and power?) ratio is what ultimately matters.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7orrAp5utnZOde6S7zGiqoaenZIJyg5VomKacXaeyt7XSnqpmmqWhuaW72Z6pZqyilru0tdKtpqtlk6TCr8CMammbZZ6kwW5%2BwQ%3D%3D