3DMarks & GFXBenchmark - Intel Iris Pro 5200 Graphics Review: Core i7-4950HQ Tested

Publish date: 2024-06-16

3DMarks & GFXBenchmark

We don't use 3DMark to draw GPU performance conclusions but it does make for a great optimization target. Given what we've seen thus far, and Intel's relative inexperience in the performance GPU space, I wondered if Iris Pro might perform any differently here than in the games we tested.

It turns out, Iris Pro does incredibly well in all of the 3DMarks. Ranging from tying the GT 650M to outperforming it. Obviously none of this has any real world impact, but it is very interesting. Is Intel's performance here the result of all of these benchmarks being lighter on Intel's weaknesses, or is this an indication of what's possible with more driver optimization?

3DMark: Ice Storm

3DMark: Ice Storm Extreme

3DMark: Cloud Gate

3DMark: Fire Strike

3DMark: Fire Strike Extreme

3DMark 11 - Performance Defaults

3DMark 06

I also included GFXBenchmark 2.7 (formerly GL/DXBenchmark) as another datapoint for measuring the impact of MSAA on Iris Pro:

GFXBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD

GFXBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex HD - 4X MSAA

Iris Pro goes from performance competitive with the GT 650M to nearly half its speed once you enable 4X MSAA. Given the level of performance Iris Pro offers, I don't see many situations where AA will be enabled, but it's clear that this is a weak point of the microarchitecture.

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7orrAp5utnZOde6S7zGiKoaenZJavsMSxZm9xaWiMpJzAoJx2bFaWua2JpZqjrJ1WqLyzwJxpXamZl5qKcoKFrKOun22eu7Wxy2agq6GjYr2zu4xuaWloXZy%2ForzHopqsZaKaw6qx1maaqKqVYrZ4gJhuZ6GpXamytMDEnQ%3D%3D